Showing posts with label comics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label comics. Show all posts

Friday, 6 June 2014

Maus, a survivor's tale by Art Spiegelman

I re-read this work which I first read I think in 1989. It's brilliant. It tells one Jew's story of being deprived of his comfortable life in Poland, fighting the Germans, being rounded up into a ghetto, people being taken away batch by batch, hiding away from the Nazis in desperately cramped conditions and finally being betrayed and taken to Auschwitz. It tells a terrible tale of loss.It also tells the tale of a son who finds his old father very irritating and irrational, especially in his fixation with money, but from the story of the father's traumatic experiences we find out how much, in the end, money does really matter. It bought them time.

All the Jews are drawn as mice, and yet... we understand their emotions from their body language. We also understand from the drawings who are the virile young mice and who are the elderly.

"a remarkable work, awesome in its conception and execution ... at one and the same time a novel, a documentary, a memoir and a comic book. Brilliant, just brilliant." 
Jules Feiffer 
 From the Guardian: 11th June 2009

Art Spiegelman has found it difficult to produce another long-length work since Maus.

Spiegelman, 61, looks just as he draws himself - a waistcoat, a constant cigarette; he is self-mockingly neurotic but infinitely wise, still carrying the heavy burden of guilt that plagues survivors' children. His vast career has ranged from the grotesque Garbage Pail Kids, to In the Shadow of No Towers, his comic-strip journal about September 11, and last year's reissue of Breakdowns, a graphic memoir described as "the Citizen Kane of modern comics".

Despite the awful details of his life, Spiegelman's confessional style makes his works almost impossible to put down. His parents were forced into the Polish ghettos in 1941, reluctantly handing their eldest son - Spiegelman's brother - over to relatives to hide him. The little boy was poisoned to death by his aunt during a Nazi raid; she thought it better than letting him go to the camps, and killed herself, too. His grief-stricken parents ended up in Auschwitz, which they survived. Spiegelman was born after the war and raised in New York, an only child with a "ghost brother". His father was brutalised and damaged; his mother took her own life when Spiegelman was 20 and didn't leave a note. All this is laid bare in his work. To him, Maus, published in 1986 and 1992, was, "as a blues musician would say, my crossover hit"; but he sees all his work on a continuum, "made from the same fractured psyche".

..What he calls his "efficiently casual" drawings in Maus took 20 to 30 drafts. He is so paralysed by the pressure of creating the perfect sketchbook that he prefers to draw while on the phone, on Post-It notes or envelopes, which he usually throws away. If he is drawing on a newspaper scrap, it is easier to shut down the left side of the brain, so the right side is free to move around; he won't know what the drawing is until it is finished.

Spiegelman tells me this in a stream of rapid-fire, Woody Allen-style self-deprecation as we walk down a Paris street. "I have too much respect for books, so to make a mark in a blank one seems like a violation," he says. "Then the neurosis compounds itself, because if you make a good drawing, you don't want to screw the book up by making a bad drawing after. So I have a lot of sketchbooks that have one drawing in them - a whole shelf full. And then if you make a bad drawing, you never want to look at the book again. So I have a lot of sketchbooks that have one page torn out that I never went back to. It's very rare that I can just get myself engaged and overcome all these strange inhibitions I've set up for myself." Still, he loves these drawings for their quality as "electrocardiograms, recording thought very directly". Publishing the sketchbooks has been liberating, he says. "When you've been revealed in all your pathetic nakedness, there's nothing else to lose. So yes, finally therapy that worked!"

... This was an experiment in forcing himself to sit down every day and draw in a sketchbook in 2007. The self-analytical sketches include bloodstained "finished" drawings on a battlefield. "It was a kind of, 'What's your problem, Jack?'" he says. "And what the problem has tended to be over many years now is that ever since Maus resulted in this bright Klieg light always aimed in my direction, which has its benefits, it has also created this discomforting sense of always being observed, as if I had little eyeballs sitting on my shoulder with arms and legs, and all the eyeballs are saying, 'Oh look, look, he made a line!' That's not the best way to make lines." Will he ever escape the shadow of Maus? "It's even worse than that," he says, lighting a cigarette. "Most other cartoonists are afraid of the same thing." He means that every graphic novel is compared to Maus. "As a result, it's sort of a curse on me and all other cartoonists I know."
...
Spiegelman worries that this makes him sound like one of his drawings ("megalomaniac with an inferiority complex"), but he hates critics using Maus as a measuring stick for new work. "The thing is, Maus was not made to teach anybody except me anything. I knew I had a story worth telling. But it wasn't like, 'I know, I'll take the heaviest subject I know and turn it into a comic - that'll show the bastards.'" His aim was to "build the damn thing to last", by making a well-structured comic. Now, he feels, structure has been eclipsed by subject matter. "On the other," he says, "I realise I'm very fortunate. Maus has given me a licence to kill. I can even publish my sketchbooks."

Spiegelman, who prefers the spelling "comix" (a nod to the underground comics movement he emerged from), remains the champion defender of the form. His third sketchbook in this collection, Nose, was made when he and his wife, the French art editor Françoise Mouly, ran the 1980s comix magazine Raw, when comics were at their nadir of respectability. The underground comics explosion of the 1960s and 70s had come to an end, and even mainstream comic books were dying off. Spiegelman argued that when a mass medium, such as the comic, stops being so, "it either has to become art or die". He is currently compiling a vast anthology of American children's comic book literature from 1938 and 1961; this has meant unearthing the comics put on bonfires in the 1950s "when comics were the Grand Theft Auto of their moment", seen as causing delinquency.

With Maus, Spiegelman says he wanted to make "a long comic book that needed a bookmark and would have the density I associate with novels"; but he never used the term graphic novel. "I kind of like the unsavoury roots of the form," he says. "It's not like I want it all dressed up in a tuxedo so it can be in public. Comics are the hunch-backed dwarves of the arts and they should be proud of the fact." Recently, he was reading Posy Simmonds on a plane and a man said, "Oh I've heard of that graphic novel, is it good?" Spiegelman grins. "Ten years earlier, people would have given me a wide berth: that guy's a moron, he's reading comic books and he's a grown up. So I realise things have changed and as long as you call them graphic novels, it's OK to read them. If that's the case, so be it."

He has just had three sketchbooks published, exquisitely tied up with an elasticated leg band (at least, it was too small for my head). I've never met anybody as painstaking as Spiegelman, nor anyone who has come close to producing a sustained masterpiece like Maus. These sketchbooks may explain why it is so good: he took infinite pains to get it right. It also explains why he has done nothing like it since: he just takes so long to do anything.

...
Drawing comics (as Spiegelman puts it, "make boxes - fill them - cartoonists and undertakers - same business") is one of the most constraining art forms. "By pencilling and inking my comics," writes Spiegelman, "I cover my traces, dressing up my demons before they reach the public. The rehearsed snap of a 'professional' line replaces raw and intimate seismographs of thought." I couldn't have put it better myself. Drawing has to question, to record, to speculate - but above all, it has to breathe, free from the pressure to perform. Whether it's bound in books or not, that's what happens in sketches.

Thursday, 22 May 2014

British comics at the British Library


On Sunday I went to see the exhibition of comics at the BL. It wasn't as popular as I had expected. It was reasonably busy - I must have missed some of the exhibitions as I jumped the queues around the most popular showcases, and surely somewhere they had some issues of Bunty in its heyday. That was a terrific comic, still quite stuck in the 1950's in its styling. I guess those comics trained the readers' eyes to understand the huge range of compositions that go to make the comics interesting visually. I think they are a terrific medium for a story. They get into our heads.

The oldest book on display was a religious book from Germany that was more pictures than words but showed how old some graphic ideas are: four flying angels holding a rectangle for a written message. The maddening thing is that all the exhibits are in glass boxes and you can't turn the pages. You just get to look at 2 pages of each publication, when the whole thing looks so interesting, but is out of bounds for the likes of me.

The curator, Paul Gravett, points out that comics can be a powerful tool for education and propaganda, used for example, by the Young National Front, and the anti-Nazi League. They are also used for military training manuals.There was a good political section.

At times comics have been regarded as harmful to the young - they do seem mostly to be very sensationalist in content.  Judge Dredd and Tank Girl are both British creations, while they both look very American. But I was rather sad that the exhibition's parameters meant that there were no Marvel comics, with their garish colouring and perfect line drawings.

Neither was there any mention of Maus by Art Spiegelman, which is the brilliant graphic telling of his Polish Jewish family during the Nazi years and something of their later years in the USA, and that is the only adult graphic novel I have bought myself.

There are comics with graphic sexual content, which I had never seen before. Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie have done some fearless work there, the only trouble being their fantasies involve very young girls and at this more healthy time when women are at last able to talk about the shame of being groped or sexually abused as children, publishing these fantasies is wrong. Why don't sexually mature women appeal to the imagination? Why must it prey on children?

I decided to buy V for Vendetta, because it is so famous. I noted that Alan Moore, "in Marvelman, 1982, investigated the psychological impact that superpowers would have on an ordinary person, and generally subverted superhero cliches." Well done him! Because he started a new crop of stories and films for all the old superheroes (the Spidy films with Toby McGuire) even including James Bond, not a superhero but finally discovering his vulnerability, starting from Casino Royale.

In short I made a long list of titles that look interesting, which I also did when I went to the sci-fi exhibition at the same place, and I came away with "Days of the Bagnold Summer" and "V for Vendetta", which I am reading at the moment.