Showing posts with label being a man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label being a man. Show all posts

Friday, 13 May 2016

Watching the telly - Grayson Perry

Last night on Channel 4 there was another programme by Grayson Perry. His thing is to go and explore certain experiences of Being a Man and then make artworks out of them. In this show he went to some grim estates and interviewed some gangs of youths who wear hoodies, go about in gangs and get into trouble with the police. Sometimes there's drug-dealing, sometimes there are stabbings of other locals gangs. When Grayson interviews them - and their mums - you see there's more to the story that this. There's a lack of work for the men, and a lack of "roles" for male people.

Anyway, the artwork he made was a statue which was quite horrifying - a totemic figure with all these knives sticking out of it and the title "King of Nowhere". The thing about Grayson is he seems harmless and yet his work packs a punch. He tells you what he's thinking about - that the young men feel humiliated by their inability to find a place in the pecking order, except at the very bottom, and they have no father figure to give them a leg-up. In this case he shows that the young man himself is hurt and gets more hurt (all those knives) even as he struggles along with his balaclava and his hood up and his joints and his mates. They are also very skinny, these boys, as though they live on Monster Munch and tomato ketchup. Certainly, this show made me think about them with a teacher's concern.

It seemed to me that Grayson shouldn't have shown them his artwork, it was a very hurtful moment, as though he was sticking knives in them himself. They shrugged it off in front of the camera  - quite funny comments - but how did they actually feel? Grayson is very talented and very famous and I don't think he should use his position to be cruel.

watch it now: 30 days only


GQ magazine article here-suicide

Sunday, 2 February 2014

Being a Man - Grayson Perry

Grayson talked to us dressed as his alter ego, Clare. It seems to be his public persona. Clare is a little girl in strap shoes, short socks and a lovely flowery dress, all petticoats, and a big lace collar. But Clare is also a powerful figure: larger than life. She takes the stage, she walks up and down it to talk to us and to show off, and she enjoys herself. She makes us laugh. Is the laughter partly a result of being made uneasy - the collision of opposite sexualities?

I can't remember anything Grayson said, apart from his map of the male brain, which put self-righteousness right at the front and was backed by an area called baloney, which is called upon when a man needs to justify himself. Very funny. He talked about men with beards and men who can mend things and men with sheds but I can't remember what his point was! Was is just to amuse? He thought that it's good for men to open up and talk about the deep stuff that affects them - he told us about his experiences of group therapy in which everyone cried every week - and he felt that was liberating. It worked for him.

He also told us that he was an alpha male and that he is very competitive on a bicycle. He has obviously done loads of cycling, and in races, he gloats as he overtakes.

But his competitiveness extends into his cross-dressing. He is proud to be the most famous tranny in the country, and he out-feminines all the women around him. He makes real women look drab and a bit lacking in effort. This is interesting. I am a cords and jumpers woman. I wear a kind of Barber jacket (not a real one, an M&S effort). I have no sexual persona. But I envy Grayson his lacy skirts. I do like lacy skirts. Somehow, it's more OK for him to wear them than for me to wear them, at our age. For him, it's a big camp show he can put on, but for me it's a one-way trip to ridicule. I think that for Grayson his cross-dressing is art : he denied this in the Reith lectures but it's obvious to me. He is making lovely tapestries now. You can see some on the web. The colours are gorgeous.

From the Guardian reviewer, who went to a few different events at the BAM festival:
Still, it's early days; given the demand for tickets, Kelly has already committed to BAM being an annual event, perhaps even the start of a movement. All movements need a manifesto, and it took Grayson Perry in one of his Bo-Peepiest pink party dresses to provide one. Few men have done as much original thinking about what it means to be male as the transvestite potter, champion cyclist, therapy survivor, Turner prizewinner, devoted husband and father.
Grayson insisted that all we believed about men could be unbelieved – men can, despite the propaganda, multitask ("I never go upstairs without carrying something") – and they can prevail in the constant battle with testosterone and keep it in their pants (frilly or otherwise), if they put their minds to it.
He ended with a scribbled series of demands. "We men ask ourselves and each other for the following: the right to be vulnerable, to be uncertain, to be wrong, to be intuitive, the right not to know, to be flexible and not to be ashamed." He insisted that men sit down to achieve them. He received, deservedly, a standing ovation.

Monday, 6 January 2014

Being a Man

We are going to a talk on Being a Man by Grayson Perry at the Southbank. Grayson will have given a lot of thought to this topic and I hope he's going to say some interesting things about it. It has been pointed out to me that my husband is a very stereotypical sort of man. He doesn't think much about his clothes or do anything new with his hair (what's left of it), he is chattier to women than he is to men, he gets together with other men to do things (row, make committee decisions) rather than for social reasons, he takes his friends for granted, he keeps up with sport (perhaps in order to talk with other men about it?), he doesn't notice dust or mess, he is happier mending things than buying things, he has nothing to say about his emotions most of the time, he hides behind a newspaper when motionless. On the other hand, some men would not go to a talk on Being a Man, and my husband is looking forward to it, so there you are, he can still surprise me.

I wonder if this talk will mention any of the above, and debunk it all, or decry it all!

In the Sherlock episode we have just seen there was the most ghastly bromance between Sherlock and Watson. They kept talking about their feelings for each other and praising each other in public. Really, it was completely out of character. I don't mind Sherlock hinting that he has feelings by perhaps, sulking or looking grumpy, but not this gushy stuff that would make the girliest girl look a bit soppy...

I loved the bit where they went all out for a big drunken stag night and in spite of Sherlock's calculations, they got drunk, incompetent, sleepy, sick, and home within 2 hours. I roared as it seemed all too familiar. It was a funny episode but I prefer the characters to be consistent. Sherlock's wall of mystery and restraint crumbled away like an Oxo cube.