Showing posts with label Abi Morgan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abi Morgan. Show all posts

Sunday, 20 November 2016

Charles Dickens - a life by Claire Tomalin

I took up this book after watching "The Invisible Woman" which I found a really terrible film. There is hardly any dialogue and lots of shots of women staring miserably out of the window, or at each other. It's by Abi Morgan, but it is no good at all. But it did make me curious about Dickens (who was played in the film by Ralph Fiennes (very good)).

This is a terrific life of Dickens which goes some way to evaluating his works as well as telling the story of what he did. His childhood was blighted by having vey irresponsible parents. But he took to journalism and then to writing stories that would sell magazines. He was a very adventurous traveller.  He loved putting on plays and he loved the theatre and the people of the theatre. He loved excursions, booze and parties, and had some great friends whom he loved. He had a great need to walk for 8 miles or so around London every day, or further - sometimes much further. And he was a great worker. When he really needed to work, he worked extremely hard.



Some of this endless action must have come from great sexual energy, and he kept his wife pregnant most of the time. She had 10 children who lived, and one baby died in infancy. Dickens seems not to have loved these children very much. He sent the boys to France to school all except the eldest, who was educated at Eton, where he didn't shine. Dickens could see the need for education but he couldn't find the kind that would be useful to his sons and daughters. Only one son seemed bright, and that was the youngest, called Henry, who went to Oxford, and became a lawyer. Dickens was really proud of him, and taught him shorthand, which he thought would be useful to him at lectures. The rest of his family was a flock of dependents. He had dependent parents, (his father was a scoundrel). dependent brothers and sisters, and a dependent wife and sister-in-law, and a huge brood of non-earning children.

On top of these, Dickens took on the care of fallen women, in a fallen women's home. He did this with a rich friend of his, Miss Coutts, and there was always a manager of the home too. The aim of the enterprise was to reform the fallen women, and teach them wifely skills and habits, so that they could go out to the colonies (including South Africa) and marry men who needed them. Claire Tomalin estimates that this was a very successful enterprise. Not all the women stayed to be reformed, and if they broke the rules they were forced to go, but the attempt at reform succeeded in many cases and the home did very useful work.

All this ended when Dickens was a rich and famous man in his fifties. Suddenly, he wanted more out of his sex life than his habitual life with Catherine. When he met the Ternan sisters - an acting family - but respectable - he changed his whole life. He left his wife. He risked becoming an outcast, and indeed, by the standards of the day he should have become an outcast. He blamed his wife for the ending of the marriage and he was very secretive about the exact nature of his relationship with Nelly Ternan.

The poor girl! She was 18 when she met the great man and clearly she wanted very much to say "No" to him. But he was so persistent and got the whole family so much in his debt by doing them all favours (especially having her sister's voice trained) that I suppose she felt that she must say Yes. So Dickens hid her away in France for a while (he loved France) and then he set her up in a house in Peckham. And she was his mistress for a few days a week until he died.

(She was then 32. Luckily she looked much younger, So she pretended she was much younger, and that she had known Dickens when she was a child (I suppose the whole family had to join in this deception) and she married a man 12 years younger than herself who didn't know her history of consorting with Dickens. He was a clergyman. )

So, Dickens. He was a great man. He was an extraordinary man. But at some point he decided he could have whatever he wanted, and therefore he behaved abominably to a young girl who had no man to defend her. Yes, in later years they must have had some happiness. But it involved him being intensely cruel to a wife who had done nothing whatever wrong, except bore him and grow quite fat. He made his cruel reasons for leaving her very public. He was also very heartless to his sons.

Fascinating man, and in many ways a very good one.

Saturday, 28 November 2015

A good radio programme, and other entertainments


Very funny - and beautiful - dialogue between Joanna Lumley and Roger Allam. Also enjoyed David Attenborough as himself.

The Lady in the Van
Miss Shepherd was very unreasonable.
Maggie Smith is actually still very soignee
Alan Bennett makes London look like a village.
Took my mother to see this yesterday - she is a long-time admirer of Alan Bennett. She really likes his Northern accent, his modest demeanour, his down-homeliness. Maggie Smith was amazingly good. She is an old lady playing an old lady - but there is a lot of physicality involved - and a lot of mixed and confused emotion for her to convey - and she is brilliant. I like the post-modern Alan Bennetts talking to each other, and the street of arty people (including the afore-mentioned Roger Allam. I'm afraid I thought it went on too long.

Spectre

this is an excellent Bond with all the usual elements: a car chase, a shoot out, a fist fight, a torture scene, a woman (who is far too young for him; Daniel Craig seems to be embarrassed by his own un-avuncular intentions), an aerial chase, a race against the clock, a life-saving gadget, some humour and a tense visit to the secret headquarters of an evil empire. It takes place in some wonderful locations and, of course, London. It has one unusual element: that is:  Q, M, another scrabble letter and Miss Moneypenny all come out and help Bond when the chips are down. There is something a bit political about it but it is quite subtle: something about not trusting the new just because it's new. A new technology may look slick but have a sly purpose we do not want - very post Edward Snowden.

Suffragettes

This was another script by the amazing Abi Morgan. It showed that women were powerless when they fought for the vote. They had no rights over their own children, they were subject to abuse and couldn't fight back. The vote didn't do everything for them but it gave them a start in winning equal rights. And hoorah for Meryl Streep who came on and showed what a bit of (actually a lot of) charisma can do for a cause.
HBC doesn't often play intelligent and earnest - it suits her.
There are too many people without hats in this film. At this time, everyone wore a hat.

Friday, 20 November 2015

I miss Nicola Walker

In "River"she was friendly and funny and always made River smile. In "Unforgotten" she was thorough, thoughtful and kind. Twice a week for 5 weeks she was unmissable.

I wrote about "River" before - in the end it turned out to be about motherhood as much as anything - a mother's dilemma about working/ not working. Probably Abi Morgan would say she wasn't commenting, just observing what goes on in the world of working mothers with highly demanding careers. But the whole thing - looking at what his mother's desertion had done to River, what it had done to another character - did add up to a comment on this. If you want a healthy society, you need mothers (or fathers) who will commit a fair amount of themselves - their time AND their attention and their intelligence - to parenting. This means part-time working and lousy pay and probably ruining your career. I did it, and what's more I think it was worth it, but I'm not a greedy person. I don't expect much.

Thursday, 22 October 2015

River by Abi Morgan

This is the first time I have written about a TV programme as though it were a book. It is a cop drama - but it is a fine quality drama, with a current of profound tragedy with flashes of happiness and humour.

It borrows from Scandi noir - it even borrows a well-known Scandinavian actor - but instead of the cold and bleakness of Sweden it shows the chrome and glass of London - also the scarred concrete and the underpasses. Somehow it is all lit in such a way that it's glamorised.  But the setting showcases the feelings and the emotions are very profound.

Once again, modern day heroes are not simply ordinary fellows doing their jobs bravely, they are tortured souls. And so, in the way of the times in which we live, they take the medication prescribed for tortured souls and try to pretend everything's O.K. Like the city the medical health issue is glamorised.

I guess we must ask ourselves: "is this really the way to live"? I know I have posed this question before in my blog, when I wrote about "Silver Linings Playbook". If the world (society as we experience it) is so unbearably shitty, shouldn't we change it so we can deal with it? Make a society we can live in without medication? Is that a ridiculous thing to wish for?

But let us not take away from the drama, which is a fine piece of writing, and the leading actors are simply amazing.