Sunday 20 December 2015

Post Paris: The Greens are disappointed by the government's Energy Bill

Caroline Lucas, M.P. for the Greens, says:
 
"It’s difficult to think of a piece of legislation that is less fit-for-purpose, if the Government were serious about turning warm words in the Paris climate agreement into action.
Perhaps it’s little wonder that the Government decided to delay the Bill’s second reading in the Commons until after the Paris climate talks were over. 
 
Yes, the UK’s coal fired power stations must be phased out – but they must be replaced with renewable energy - not gas. That means rethinking the raft of mind-bogglingly backward policy decisions we’ve seen since the election – reversing solar subsidy cuts and reinstating the zero carbon homes policy for starters.
 
That should be the focus of any Energy Bill in 2016. The Paris climate agreement provides an even stronger case for MPs to refuse to give the Bill a second reading, reject it in its entirety, and demand the Government goes back to the drawing board.
 
Looking ahead to 2016, we’ve got some big fights to come. The climate movement will have a key role to play in holding politicians to account.
 
The Paris climate talks failed in part because of the influence of fossil fuel corporations over government. Those same oil and gas companies have a death grip on the UK’s democratic decision making too. Nowhere is this more obvious than the trade deals being struck, which threaten to undermine efforts to cut carbon emissions as well as our democracy.
 
But the strength and breadth of the mobilisation across civil society we are seeing is more powerful than corporations and their friends in Government realise.
 
Unusually, a similar sentiment was to be found in the Economist, with their verdict on Paris concluding:
 “Genuine concern about the climate, public opinion and international pressure produced the pledges that were made for Paris. The hope is that similar bottom-up processes, rather than unenforceable UN mandates, will drive up the level of action in decades to come.”

No comments:

Post a Comment